a girl doing exercise

It designs her own Emily Ratajkowski. His custom-made Kim Kardashian. For almost anyone else, it can look like going through an unending two-way mirror lobby to browse for bathing suits (online, at least). Nothing looks like it; every movement is observed, and no move takes you closer to choosing an appropriate outfit. 

Bathing Suits Bonanza

More alternatives than ever seem to be available. You will seek Google Swimwear and be assaulted with advertisements for companies such as Summersalt, YouSwim, Lively, and Andie on every viable platform — upstarts to disrupt the market in larger sizes using different mixing matches. 

An enlarged marketing vocabulary has brought forth an abundance of alternatives for bathing suits. Suits for “long torso” and for “minimal,” “medium,” and “maximum” support and covers are available. 

Some bathing suits are suggested for particular circumstances (“tanning, but around the grandparents” “a working day on the beach “), while some are allocated to archetypes (“additional AF,” “literally all”). There are extensive guidelines containing charts and quality analysis of every style. Terms such as “substantial,” “high shoulder,” and “low hip” seem to enhance the personalization. 

Bra Size Issues

However, one of the most problematic fit parameters typically goes nearly unmentioned throughout the whole discourse about inclusion on these sites: bra size in bathing suits. 

Some guidance is available. Many sites have algorithms and filters that restrict the stock by every measurement kind. Some even demonstrate how bathing suits’ sizes match bra sizes. 

However, attempting to make sense of all alpha-numeric designations might make one feel stuck in the memory of the math lady and reconcile equations that do not calculate. If someone is wearing a DDD, according to True & Co., are they 1, 2, or 3 as the typical female cup size in America? Do you have L, XL, or XXL? 

The size itself is practically meaningless, even for those who can understand charts and jargon. The head of technical design and design at the Fode Institute of Technology, Deborah Beard, said: “There is no norm.” Companies are instead using the average client to size their products. Ms. Beard added, as a merchant, “You have a dimension to be known.” 

She added that huge cup sizes pose no specific problem from a technical point of view: “It is the same structure whether it is little or big.” She remarked. However, the specialist area of DD+ bathing persists. 


Some of the critical stages include HerRoom, Bare Needs, Freya, Fantasy, and Panache. Each has a vast array of large swimming tops. 

But although most businesses alter stocks to trend—perhaps you have seen all the French cut bikini bottoms?—many more comprehensive firms provide year after year variants on the same patterns. They vary from too young to full-colored: bright colors, shouting graphics, aggressive undergrowth, lace, bows, buttons (???). And there are the “lowered” and “skirted” bases, which are usually coupled with them. 

The athletic yet supportive full-bust bathing suit is more elusive; some individuals are tired of hunting and finish off with a waterproof sporting bra. Or it might be a week of waste to perform risk-reward analysis on J. Crew and Lululemon C-cup and D-cup bathing suits. Both businesses have increased their size in prior years. But these choices all disappeared this summer. The recurring motif in their evaluations is “BRING Back D-DD P L E A SE!!!.” 

The NPD Group’s clothing analyst, Kristen Classi-Zummo, says: “Consumers want companies that take unique body types into account. In recent years, she pointed out that half of the dollar growth in women’s swimwear occurred in tops and bottoms, therefore ensuring a more personalized fit.